|
Since the firm's founding in 1958, antitrust and trade regulation law has
been a major field of legal service at Eckert Seamans. Large,
medium-sized, and small companies throughout the
United States
and abroad have been counseled by the firm on trade matters and in the
litigation of civil and criminal antitrust cases.
The firm's antitrust and trade regulation attorneys have extensive experience
in representing clients in civil and criminal antitrust cases, including cases
ultimately decided by the United States Supreme Court. They have also
represented clients in grand jury investigations, administrative proceedings,
treble damage actions, and mergers under review by antitrust enforcers.
All of these activities have called on the firm's combination of expertise in
litigation and in antitrust principles.
Among the clients represented by Eckert Seamans in antitrust cases are
airlines, multinational corporations engaged in producing or providing aluminum,
steel, ferrous metals, chemicals, electric generators, fabricated metal
products, building products, heavy equipment, natural gas production and
transmission, car radios, food products, health insurance, plumbing fixtures,
and waste management. The firm has advised other companies in such
businesses as food distribution, laboratory equipment, education, health care,
railway maintenance equipment, construction, pleasure boats, luggage, coal
production, land development and retail consumer product sales.
Eckert Seamans has had notable success in pursuing alternative dispute
resolution in its representation of clients involved in civil antitrust
litigation. Alternatives to trial can preserve a party's rights without
the expenditure of large sums needed for a full trial. The alternatives
that the firm has used include the presentation of evidence by each side to
chief executive officers of contending corporations, the presentation of
evidence to a judge sitting without a jury in an abbreviated proceeding, and
settlement through the involvement of a court-appointed mediator. In each
of these situations, the alternative to trial resulted in a settlement favorable
to the firm's client. The firm has also negotiated favorable plea
agreements in criminal cases.
Antitrust counseling, helping clients to avoid the risk of antitrust
litigation and dealing with the federal and state antitrust enforcement agencies
outside the litigation context, is an important service available from the
firm. Counseling is designed to help clients achieve their business goals
while minimizing antitrust risks. The firm presents seminars as part of
its clients' antitrust compliance programs. The firm also regularly
provides antitrust counseling in such areas as mergers and acquisitions,
compliance with the Hart-Scott-Rodino reporting requirements, the pricing of
products, the development of distribution networks, participation in trade
associations, franchising problems, consumer protection matters, the scope of
patent monopolies, and compliance with the Robinson-Patman Act.
The most frequently raised topics on which the firm provides antitrust
counseling involve the pricing and distribution of products. Questions
frequently handled by the firm involve price discrimination, incentives to
special customers, volume discounts, territorial and customer restraints, resale
pricing, exclusive distributorships, special demands of customers, development
of sales networks, distributor termination, franchising, contacts with
competitors and other distribution problems.<
|
|